The complaint filed last week in the Columbus, Ohio federal court notes that “Sigma was not a suitable investment for SERS because of its inherent risks and lack of liquidity.” “Placing SERS’ funds into a complex hybrid SIV with substantial leveraged interest rate risk is inconsistent with the objectives of safeguarding the principal,” it added.
The fund said it lost 95 percent of the $25 million that Wachovia had invested in Sigma. It accused Wachovia of breach of contract and fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, and violations of federal and Ohio securities laws. A securities lending program typically lets an investor lend securities to a broker-dealer, in exchange for cash that a bank invests on behalf of the investor. More than $2 trillion is on loan each day according to SunGard Financial Systems’ Astec Analytics, which tracks more than 31,000 securities.
The $9.7 billion Ohio fund contended that firms that operate securities lending programs — typically Wall Street banks — structured them to share in clients’ gains, while exposing clients to an “exclusive” risk of losses. “The practice of securities lending has been aptly described as ‘Heads, we win together. Tails, you lose — alone,'” the complaint said, quoting The New York Times.
Securities lending and borrowing is nothing new on Wall Street, in fact, it is common practice. Paying a different price based on the temperature of the stock (hot stocks costing more) is an important element for broker dealers and bank rehypothecating securities each night to earn a spread. Wells Fargo has decline to comment to date, as it has not yet fully reviewed the complaint.